Newsroom Magazine USA Edition USA Edition Today Is Saturday, May 18, 2013

Contact Information

Newsroom Banner


Thanks To You We're Growing Faster Than Ever Before

Chances are you've noticed that Newsroom Magazine is a very different publication.

We care about journalism -- and we're well aware many other organizations do it far better than we.

Our editorial standards, rules of custody, and skeptical editing for everything we produce, disseminate or expose to public viewing reflects a seriousness of purpose.

Six years after our founding, Newsroom Magazine continues to evolve the online publishing and preservation model we pioneered.

There is good news to share: Newsroom Magazine is is thriving.

And some less good news: Our limited resources, both journalistically and financially, are limiting our expansion of content.

Online News Preservation

In the six years since its founding, Newsroom Magazine has extended the field of news publishing into previously uncharted areas.

We take a long range view of news -- one that considers both timeliness and historical merit.

What we do, and how we do it, was not possible in the print media era -- for our content is both timely and timeless in the sense that we share the power of immediacy with all online media plus the perseverance of an encyclopedia.

Newsroom Magazine's publishing model goes beyond immediacy -- for unlike the newspaper era -- what we publish is permanently preserved. And tagged, indexed, and constantly updated by automated sitemap sharing with Google, Yahoo, Bing, Yandex, Baidu, Sogou, Ewatch, Alexa, Facebook, and others at home and far away.

All of our content, is meant to be preserved. Thanks to the capture and storage of our content at Google, including all updates and changes, and full collection archiving by the U.S. Internet Archives, everything we say, write, opine -- whether wise, foolish, or inconsequential-- is preserved.

Newsroom Magazine content remains forever online, searchable and accessible 24 hours a day worldwide.

What's Hot Is Rarely What Matters

What we publish today is rarely as timely as the more traditional publications and online newspapers. What we choose to publish, sometimes days or months after a story first breaks, or on a subject neglected by most commercial media, is chosen to reflect one aspect of an ongoing reality for long term preservation.

From a handful of English-only readers when we published our first article -- the 1958 Edward R. Murrow speech before the Radio Television Directors Association in Chicago -- we have grown and wizened about our responsibilities to our readers and our own limitations and shortfalls.

Our most read article so far this year, The Adventures Of Bernie In Wonderland, was published November 23rd, 2009. The article consists of the unexpurgated SEC interview of Harry Markopolos in the Bernie Madoff Ponzi swindle case. It is not very interesting reading and it is very long -- but we published it in the belief that what it revealed was important and unlikely to remain online in its original format.

Newsroom Magazine's Storehouse Grows Every Day

The number of publications who devote themselves to publishing credible, responsible and probative content for posterity has dwindled.

Today Newsroom Magazine publishes a storehouse of credible, probative and relevant content -- well over 5000 articles including commentaries, essays, definitions, photographs, stories, reviews, discussions, tutorials, and logical explanations.

Our readership is nearly three times was it was only last year. Few might come to our content for entertainment -- for our purpose is otherwise.

If You Publish, They Will Come

We are read on Capitol Hill, along K Street, and in the halls of government inside the beltway and around the world.

We are read daily on college campuses at home and abroad. We're visited from military ships at sea. We serve law-firms, major corporations, Wall Street the UK Parliament, state governments and cities with credible useful information.

Some of the world's most prestigious news organizations use Newsroom Magazine for fact-checking.

Government Information Unfiltered, Sometimes Imperfect

The amount of official news proffered each day by government, whether at home or abroad, is accelerating. Some of it newsworthy, most of it not.

Our job is to thoughtfully choose what's worthy of the attention of our readers.

About 1% of government issued news we receive each day qualifies as newsworthy. Only the most relevant, or reflective of government at its best, or at its worst, or evidence of overreach, or ineptitude makes it newsworthy.

We leave the issue of deciding which if any of these qualifications applies to what we publish up to the reader.

Formatted For People On The Go, Or On The Hunt

All of our government news content includes above the headline call out meant to convey the principal facts, action or information for those with little time to read a long document.

Our job is to carefully and skeptically choose relevant governmental content for our readers -- and to include the unexpurgated original source material, whose chain of custody we control.

Online Editorial Standards, Ethics And Purpose

Our commitment to time-honored journalistic standards and a clear statement about the ethics to which we agree to be held today and tomorrow, Newsroom Magazine began publication when the Internet was young -- 2006.

Our prime mission then, as now, is to publish non political ideas, definitions, essays and editorials.

To speak to the state of this honorable calling.

And to inform the public about those things, events and ideas that matter most to us all.

Today, tomorrow, forever.


Editorial Standards & Policies
Browse All Content
Browse
Justice Department Section
Blackstone Medical To Pay $30 Million To Settle False Claims Case

Published: Sunday November 4, 2012 8:00 am EDT
Article Length: 890 Words
Reading Time: 4 Minutes

 Kickbacks to physicians are incompatible with a properly functioning health care system. They can corrupt physicians’ medical judgment and cause misallocation of vital health care resources.   Today’s settlement reflects the progress we are making in the ongoing fight against abusive and illegal practices in the healthcare industry.

 Stuart F. Delery

Washington

Justice department

Orthofix Subsidiary, Blackstone Medical, Pays U.S. $30 Million To Settle False Claims Act Allegations

Allegedly Paid Kickbacks to Doctors to Induce Use of Company’s Products

November 2, 2012

Orthofix International NV, has agreed to pay the United States $30 million to settle allegations that an Orthofix subsidiary, Blackstone Medical Inc., paid illegal kickbacks to physicians in order to induce use of the company’s products, the Justice Department announced today.   Orthofix, which manufactures spinal implants and other spinal surgery products, is a publicly traded company headquartered in Curacao.

The civil settlement resolves allegations that Blackstone paid kickbacks to spinal surgeons.   These alleged kickbacks took a number of forms, including sham consulting agreements, sham royalty arrangements, sham research grants, travel and entertainment.

“Kickbacks to physicians are incompatible with a properly functioning health care system,” said Stuart F. Delery, the Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Department’s Civil Division.   “They can corrupt physicians’ medical judgment and cause misallocation of vital health care resources.   Today’s settlement reflects the progress we are making in the ongoing fight against abusive and illegal practices in the healthcare industry.”

“This settlement demonstrates the government’s continued resolve to ensure that patients receive, and the government pays for, health care that is based solely on sound medical judgment, not compromised by kickbacks,” said Carmen M. Ortiz, U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts.  “We believe that this is a just and meaningful resolution that is in the best interests of the citizens of the Commonwealth and taxpayers across the nation.”

“To those contemplating taking advantage of Medicare for their own gain, today’s settlement sends a loud, clear message,” said Susan Waddell, Special Agent in Charge of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General New England region.  “Law enforcement will work aggressively to eliminate efforts to abuse vital taxpayer-funded health care programs.”

“Our men and women in uniform and their beneficiaries rely on their healthcare providers to perform their jobs without bias and make decisions in the best interest of their patients,” said Kathryn Feeney, Resident Agent in Charge for the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, New Haven Resident Agency.  “Kickbacks, like those alleged here, undermine the TRICARE Military Health System .   A settlement like this helps maintain the integrity of an important program our armed services depend on.”

“This case provides another reminder of the FBI’s commitment to investigating and uncovering healthcare fraud in all its forms- including kickbacks that can influence physician judgment.   As this settlement demonstrates, the FBI will continue to work tirelessly with its law enforcement partners and the Department of Justice to ensure that these cases are brought to a just and speedy resolution,” said Richard DesLauriers, Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Boston Division.

As part of the settlement, Orthofix also agreed to enter into a corporate integrity agreement with the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services, which provides for procedures and reviews to be put in place to avoid and promptly detect conduct similar to that alleged in this matter.

The allegations resolved by today’s settlement were initially alleged in a whistleblower suit filed under the False Claims Act, which authorizes private citizens to bring suit on behalf of the government for false claims for government funds, and share in any recovery.   The whistleblower in this case, Susan Hutcheson, will receive $8 million as her share of the settlement amount.

This resolution is part of the government’s emphasis on combating health care fraud and another step for the Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team (HEAT) initiative, which was announced by Attorney General Eric Holder and Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services in May 2009.   The partnership between the two departments has focused efforts to reduce and prevent Medicare and Medicaid financial fraud through enhanced cooperation.   One of the most powerful tools in that effort is the False Claims Act, which the Justice Department has used to recover $9.5 billion since January 2009 in cases involving fraud against federal health care programs.   The Justice Department’s total recoveries in False Claims Act cases since January 2009 are over $13.2 billion.

The case was handled by the Justice Department’s Civil Division, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts, Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services, the FBI and the Defense Criminal Investigative Service of the Department of Defense.   The claims settled by this agreement are allegations only, and there has been no determination of liability.

The lawsuit was captioned United States ex rel. Hutcheson v. Blackstone Medical, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 06-11771-WGY (D. Mass.).

Source: Justice Department

Search Optimization Tags: * * *