 |
USA Edition | Today Is Sunday, May 19, 2013 |
|---|
Welcome To Newsroom Magazine
|
|---|
|
|
Thanks To You We're Growing Faster Than Ever Before
Chances are you've noticed that Newsroom Magazine is a very different publication.
We care about journalism -- and we're well aware many other organizations do it far better than we.
Our editorial standards, rules of custody, and skeptical editing for everything we produce, disseminate or expose to public viewing reflects a seriousness of purpose.
Six years after our founding, Newsroom Magazine continues to evolve the online publishing and preservation model we pioneered.
There is good news to share: Newsroom Magazine is is thriving.
And some less good news: Our limited resources, both journalistically and financially, are limiting our expansion of content.
Online News Preservation
In the six years since its founding, Newsroom Magazine has extended the field of news publishing into previously uncharted areas.
We take a long range view of news -- one that considers both timeliness and historical merit.
What we do, and how we do it, was not possible in the print media era -- for our content is both timely and timeless in the sense that we share the power of immediacy with all online media plus the perseverance of an encyclopedia.
Newsroom Magazine's publishing model goes beyond immediacy -- for unlike the newspaper era -- what we publish is permanently preserved. And tagged, indexed, and constantly updated by automated sitemap sharing with Google, Yahoo, Bing, Yandex, Baidu, Sogou, Ewatch, Alexa, Facebook, and others at home and far away.
All of our content, is meant to be preserved. Thanks to the capture and storage of our content at Google, including all updates and changes, and full collection archiving by the U.S. Internet Archives, everything we say, write, opine -- whether wise, foolish, or inconsequential-- is preserved.
Newsroom Magazine content remains forever online, searchable and accessible 24 hours a day worldwide.
What's Hot Is Rarely What Matters
What we publish today is rarely as timely as the more traditional publications and online newspapers. What we choose to publish, sometimes days or months after a story first breaks, or on a subject neglected by most commercial media, is chosen to reflect one aspect of an ongoing reality for long term preservation.
From a handful of English-only readers when we published our first article -- the 1958 Edward R. Murrow speech before the Radio Television Directors Association in Chicago -- we have grown and wizened about our responsibilities to our readers and our own limitations and shortfalls.
Our most read article so far this year, The Adventures Of Bernie In Wonderland, was published November 23rd, 2009. The article consists of the unexpurgated SEC interview of Harry Markopolos in the Bernie Madoff Ponzi swindle case. It is not very interesting reading and it is very long -- but we published it in the belief that what it revealed was important and unlikely to remain online in its original format.
Newsroom Magazine's Storehouse Grows Every Day
The number of publications who devote themselves to publishing credible, responsible and probative content for posterity has dwindled.
Today Newsroom Magazine publishes a storehouse of credible, probative and relevant content -- well over 5000 articles including commentaries, essays, definitions, photographs, stories, reviews, discussions, tutorials, and logical explanations.
Our readership is nearly three times was it was only last year. Few might come to our content for entertainment -- for our purpose is otherwise.
If You Publish, They Will Come
We are read on Capitol Hill, along K Street, and in the halls of government inside the beltway and around the world.
We are read daily on college campuses at home and abroad. We're visited from military ships at sea. We serve law-firms, major corporations, Wall Street the UK Parliament, state governments and cities with credible useful information.
Some of the world's most prestigious news organizations use Newsroom Magazine for fact-checking.
Government Information Unfiltered, Sometimes Imperfect
The amount of official news proffered each day by government, whether at home or abroad, is accelerating. Some of it newsworthy, most of it not.
Our job is to thoughtfully choose what's worthy of the attention of our readers.
About 1% of government issued news we receive each day qualifies as newsworthy. Only the most relevant, or reflective of government at its best, or at its worst, or evidence of overreach, or ineptitude makes it newsworthy.
We leave the issue of deciding which if any of these qualifications applies to what we publish up to the reader.
Formatted For People On The Go, Or On The Hunt
All of our government news content includes above the headline call out meant to convey the principal facts, action or information for those with little time to read a long document.
Our job is to carefully and skeptically choose relevant governmental content for our readers -- and to include the unexpurgated original source material, whose chain of custody we control.
Online Editorial Standards, Ethics And Purpose
Our commitment to time-honored journalistic standards and a clear statement about the ethics to which we agree to be held today and tomorrow, Newsroom Magazine began publication when the Internet was young -- 2006.
Our prime mission then, as now, is to publish non political ideas, definitions, essays and editorials.
To speak to the state of this honorable calling.
And to inform the public about those things, events and ideas that matter most to us all.
Today, tomorrow, forever.
Editorial Standards & Policies
| UN Agency Says Internet Access Restrictions On The Rise | Browse All Content | From Flying Pigs To A Gathering Of Eagles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Previous In Section | Browse FBI Section |
Next In Section |
When LIPKIN retired from BLMIS in or about 1998, he instructed his successor, Enrica Cotellessa-Pitz, how to manipulate the revenues at BLMIS in order to reach a particular P&L result, thereby allowing the fraud at BLMIS to continue.
Washington
Irwin Lipkin, Former Controller of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Pleads Guilty
November 9, 2012
Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York; Mary Galligan, the Acting Assistant Director in Charge of the New York Field Division of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”); Robert L. Panella, Special Agent in Charge for the New York Regional Office of the U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of the Inspector General; Office of Labor Racketeering and Fraud Investigations (“DOL-OIG”); and Jonathan Kay, the Regional Director for the New York Regional Office of the United States Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (“DOL-EBSA”), announced today that IRWIN LIPKIN, the former controller of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (“BLMIS”), pled guilty in Manhattan federal court to a two-count superseding information charging him with conspiracy to commit securities fraud, to falsify records, to make false filings with the SEC, and to falsify statements in relation to documents required by ERISA, as well as a substantive count of falsifying statements in relation to documents required by ERISA. LIPKIN pled guilty before United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain.
Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said: “As only the third employee of BLMIS, Irwin Lipkin had a long history with Bernie Madoff, and he proved himself to be a loyal foot soldier—consistently and repeatedly breaking the law at his boss’ behest, and leaving as his legacy a successor he personally taught to continue cooking the books. And the benefits went both ways—Lipkin was able to enrich himself and his family through fake trades, and no-show jobs during his tenure and thereafter. Today’s guilty plea marks another step forward in our efforts to prosecute and punish anyone and everyone who we can prove participated in this breathtaking fraud.”
FBI Acting Assistant Director in Charge Mary Galligan said: “By his own admission, Irwin Lipkin aided and abetted Bernard Madoff in his colossal Ponzi scheme for more than two decades. He regularly and routinely cooked the books, a recipe for concealing the largest investment fraud in history. The government continues its effort to hold accountable everyone responsible for this epic shell game.”
DOL-OIG Special Agent in Charge Robert L. Panella said: “The investigation that led to today’s guilty plea by Irwin Lipkin serves as a stern warning to those who would knowingly undermine the financial well-being of workers. By making false statements and falsifying documents required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, Lipkin failed to protect the integrity of employee benefit plan assets. More egregiously, Lipkin personally benefited from proceeds gained as a result of this scheme which harmed the savings of thousands of investors. The OIG will continue to work with the U.S. Attorney and our law enforcement partners to investigate these types of crimes.”
DOL-EBSA New York Regional Director Jonathan Kay said: “Today’s plea marks an important step in a well-coordinated, wide-ranging multi-agency investigation. EBSA remains committed to protecting worker benefits and pursuing those who would defraud plans.”
According to the superseding information and other court documents:
LIPKIN was employed by BLMIS from 1964 through 1998, and was the first person who was not a family member to be hired by Bernard L. Madoff. In his role as controller, LIPKIN participated in maintaining the firm’s financial books and records since at least the mid-1970s. At the direction of Bernard L. Madoff, LIPKIN, along with Daniel Bonventre, Enrica Cotellessa-Pitz, and others, made false and misleading entries concerning BLMIS’ profit and loss numbers (“P&L) in the general ledger and stock record, and in supporting books and records.
As an SEC-registered broker-dealer, BLMIS was required to file FOCUS reports on a monthly, quarterly, and annual basis, as well as annual financial statements concerning BLMIS’s assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. The information contained in the FOCUS reports and the annual financial statements was derived principally from information recorded in the BLMIS general ledger and the stock record. Because those numbers were false and misleading, the corresponding numbers contained in the FOCUS reports and annual financial statements were false and misleading as well. The annual financial statements provided to various BLMIS investment advisory customers also failed to accurately reflect the P&L of BLMIS.
When LIPKIN retired from BLMIS in or about 1998, he instructed his successor, Enrica Cotellessa-Pitz, how to manipulate the revenues at BLMIS in order to reach a particular P&L result, thereby allowing the fraud at BLMIS to continue.
In addition, since at least 1975, LIPKIN and his wife maintained their own personal investment advisory accounts at BLMIS. On multiple occasions, LIPKIN asked Annette Bongiorno, a BLMIS employee who worked in the investment advisory business, to execute fake, back-dated trades in both his account and the accounts of his family members. And, in an effort to reduce his capital gains income, LIPKIN also asked Bongiorno to either cancel the sales of shares in his account well after those sales had purportedly occurred, or to document nonexistent purchases of shares near the monthly high price, and nonexistent sales near the monthly low price, weeks later. No such trades actually occurred.
LIPKIN also arranged “no-show” jobs at BLMIS for both himself and his wife. As a result, they received income from salaries, health care insurance, 401(k) plans, and other benefits to which they were not entitled.
***
LIPKIN, 74, of Paramus, New Jersey, faces a statutory maximum sentence of 10 years in prison. He is also subject to mandatory restitution and criminal forfeiture and faces criminal fines up to twice the gross gain or loss derived from the offense. Pursuant to the plea agreement, LIPKIN has agreed to forfeiture of $170 billion, including all of his real and personal property. The net proceeds from the sale of the forfeited property will be used to compensate victims of the fraud, consistent with applicable Department of Justice regulations.
Judge Swain set a sentencing date for LIPKIN of March 22, 2013, at 2:00 p.m.
Cotellessa-Pitz pled guilty in December 2011, and is awaiting sentencing. Charges against Bonventre and Bongiorno remain pending and are merely accusations. They are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
Mr. Bharara praised the investigative work of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. He also thanked the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the U.S. Department of Labor for their assistance.
These cases were brought in coordination with President Barack Obama’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force, on which Mr. Bharara serves as a co-chair of the Securities and Commodities Fraud Working Group. President Obama established the interagency Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force to wage an aggressive, coordinated, and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes. The task force includes representatives from a broad range of federal agencies, regulatory authorities, inspectors general, and state and local law enforcement who, working together, bring to bear a powerful array of criminal and civil enforcement resources. The task force is working to improve efforts across the federal executive branch, and with state and local partners, to investigate and prosecute significant financial crimes, ensure just and effective punishment for those who perpetrate financial crimes, combat discrimination in the lending and financial markets, and recover proceeds for victims of financial crimes.
The case is being handled by the Office’s Securities and Commodities Fraud Task Force. Assistant United States Attorneys Lisa A. Baroni, Julian J. Moore, Matthew L. Schwartz, Arlo Devlin-Brown and Barbara A. Ward are in charge of the prosecution.