Newsroom Magazine USA Edition USA Edition Today Is Wednesday, May 22, 2013

Contact Information

Newsroom Banner




Newsroom Magazine's principal mission is to credibly and responsibly inform readers about the world in which we live.

Skeptical Editing

What we present as fact is to the best of our knowledge true and sufficiently revealed to be relied upon.

Relevancy

What we publish is selected based on its news value and/or its national or global relevance to responsible citizens and those who seek to govern them.

Probity

What we publish is chosen to provide meaningful insight into, or clearer perspective about the world in which we live.

Fidelity To Fact

The foundations upon which our mission rest are fairness, accountability, responsibility and fidelity-to-fact.

Public Interest

Serving the public interest without fear or prejudice rests upon our collective commitment to a clearly defined code of ethics, and consistently applied journalistic standards and editorial practices.

The journalistic mechanisms by which we stand and to which we commit our reputation are credibility, relevancy and probity.

Searchable Repository

Fulfillment of our mission rests, in part, on Newsroom Magazine's searchable and globally visible repository of everything we publish.

Our mission requires that we record and index reports, findings and official statements about the role of government(s) in the world in which we live that are based upon editorial selection predicated upon credibility, relevancy and probity.

Governmental Content

To fully understand what government is doing, or failing to do, depends on a broad range of information about world and national issues and events. We focus on national and international stories -- most of which are related to U.S. government actions, decisions, legislation, regulation and military matters.

Spin And Propaganda

Government generated news and information is no more forthright, or accurate, or fair, or complete than any other source of information whose content is intended to support, explain or spin a single viewpoint. Governmental news releases, statements or testimony is by definition propaganda -- no matter how much substantive information surrounds it.

Information That Matters

Newsroom Magazine does not edit or modify government provided information, but we do consciously select and publish content that contains explicit information worthy of being permanently visible online.

What Government Says Matters

While our editors seek to publish government-sourced information for its factual foundations we knowingly publish, from time to time, governmental materials that are egregiously overstated, highly politicized, slanted to administration policy, or simply foolish or misguided.

Unvarnished Reality

What we publish is intended to provide the reader an unfiltered glimpse of government. We offer neither support for that which is best, nor criticism of that which is not. Our job is to validate that the source materials published by Newsroom Magazine are legitimate government delivered information.
The government, department, agency, or authority to which the content is attributed is solely responsible for the credibility, accuracy and fairness of what they said and how they said it.

World Wide Reference

Being an on-line publication means that the immense indexing capabilities inherent in our database(s) makes our content a repository of news and information that is easily accessible by anyone, anywhere and any time.

Responsible Adults, Skeptical Editing, Thoughtful Commentary

Those who form, select, edit, oversee, manage and/or author Newsroom Magazine content are charged with fulfilling our mission by way of a narrative, opinion, commentaries, essays, editorials, news analysis, and stories about the human condition and/or the American Experience.

Supplemental Content

Narrative content published by Newsroom Magazine is supported, when and where appropriate, by utility resources including definitions of terms or words that appear in both narrative and news content and/or logical definitions and constructs.

Newsworthy Content

In fulfillment of our mission we pledge to be responsible, credible and journalistically sound so that we might deliver newsworthy information and materials including that which reveals government in its own words absent fear or prejudice.




Editorial Standards & Policies
Browse All Content
Browse
Justice Department Section
Timothy S. Durham Sentenced To 50 Years In $200 Million Fair Financial Fraud

Published: Monday December 3, 2012 7:00 am EDT
Article Length: 1095 Words
Reading Time: 5 Minutes

This ordeal is truly a tragedy for all families involved. All we can do is ask that today’s decision send a warning to others in Indiana that if you sacrifice truth in the name of greed, if you steal from another’s American dream to enhance your own, you will be caught and you will pay a significant price.

U.S. Attorney Hogsett

Washington

Justice department

Former Fair Financial Company CEO Sentenced In Indianapolis To 50 Years In Prison For Role In $200 Million Fraud Scheme

Two Other Fair Financial Executives Sentenced Today for Roles in Scheme

November 30, 2012

WASHINGTON – The former chief executive officer of Fair Financial Company, an Ohio financial services business, was sentenced today to serve 50 years in prison for his role in a scheme to defraud approximately 5,000 investors of more than $200 million, announced Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division and U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana Joseph H. Hogsett.

Timothy S. Durham, 50, of Fortville, Ind., was sentenced today by U.S. District Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson.  In addition to his prison term, Durham was sentenced to serve two years supervised release.

James F. Cochran, the former chairman of the board of Fair, was sentenced today by Judge Magnus-Stinson to serve 25 years in prison and three years of supervised release. Rick D. Snow, the former chief financial officer of Fair, was sentenced today by Judge Magnus-Stinson to ten years in prison and two years of supervised release.

Judge Snow also ordered Durham, Cochran and Snow to pay restitution in the amount of $208 million.

“The lengthy prison sentences handed down today are just punishment for a group of executives who built a business on smoke and mirrors,” said Assistant Attorney General Breuer.  “By deliberately misleading their investors and state regulators, Mr. Durham and his co-conspirators were able defraud thousands of innocent investors.  The Justice Department will continue to devote considerable time and resources to ensure that fraudsters like Mr. Durham, Mr. Cochran and Mr. Snow are brought to justice for their crimes.”

“This ordeal is truly a tragedy for all families involved,” said U.S. Attorney Hogsett.  “All we can do is ask that today’s decision send a warning to others in Indiana that if you sacrifice truth in the name of greed, if you steal from another’s American dream to enhance your own, you will be caught and you will pay a significant price.”

“The FBI will continue to aggressively pursue financial crimes investigations,” said Special Agent in Charge Robert A. Jones of the FBI Indianapolis Division.  “Today’s sentencing represents a significant step toward justice.  We must remain mindful that the victims of this crime still suffer.”

On June 20, 2012, following an eight-day trial, a federal jury in the Southern District of Indiana convicted Durham and two co-conspirators for their roles in this scheme. Durham was convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit wire and securities fraud, 10 counts of wire fraud and one count of securities fraud.  James F. Cochran, 57, of McCordsville, Ind., was convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit wire and securities fraud, one count of securities fraud and six counts of wire fraud.  Rick D. Snow, 49, Fishers, Ind., was convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit wire and securities fraud, one count of securities fraud and three counts of wire fraud.

Durham and Cochran purchased Fair, whose headquarters was in Akron, Ohio, in 2002.  According to evidence presented at trial, between approximately February 2005 through November 2009, Durham, Cochran and Snow executed a scheme to defraud Fair’s investors by making and causing others to make false and misleading statements about Fair’s financial condition and about the manner in which they were using Fair investor money. The evidence also established that Durham, Cochran and Snow executed the scheme to enrich themselves, to obtain millions of dollars of investors’ funds through false representations and promises and to conceal from the investing public Fair’s true financial condition and the manner in which Fair was using investor money.

When Durham and Cochran purchased Fair in 2002, Fair reported debts to investors from the sale of investment certificates of approximately $37 million and income producing assets in the form of finance receivables of approximately $48 million. By November 2009, after Durham and Cochran had owned the company for seven years, Fair’s debts to investors from the sale of investment certificates had grown to more than $200 million, while Fair’s income producing assets consisted only of the loans to Durham and Cochran, their associates and the businesses they owned or controlled.

Durham, Cochran and Snow terminated Fair’s independent accountants who, at various points during 2005 and 2006, told the defendants that many of Fair’s loans were impaired or did not have sufficient collateral.  After firing the accountants, the defendants never released audited financial statements for 2005, and never obtained or released audited financial statements for 2006 through September 2009.  With independent accountants no longer auditing Fair’s financial statements, the defendants were able to conceal from investors Fair’s true financial condition.

Evidence introduced at trial showed that the defendants engaged in a variety of other fraudulent activities to conceal from the State of Ohio Division of Securities and from investors Fair’s true financial health and cash flow problems.  Evidence showed that the defendants made false and misleading statements to concerned investors who either had not received principal or interest payments on their certificates from Fair or who were worried about Fair’s financial health.  The defendants also directed employees of Fair not to pay investors who were owed interest or principal payments on their certificates.

Even though Fair’s financial condition had deteriorated and Fair was experiencing severe cash flow problems, Durham and Cochran continued to funnel Fair investor money to themselves for their personal expenses, to their family, friends and acquaintances, and to the struggling businesses that they owned or controlled.

This case is being prosecuted by Trial Attorney Henry P. Van Dyck and Senior Deputy Chief for Litigation Kathleen McGovern of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Winfield D. Ong and Nicholas E. Surmacz of the Southern District of Indiana. The investigation was led by the FBI in Indianapolis.

Source: Justice Department