Newsroom Magazine USA Edition USA Edition Today Is Saturday, May 18, 2013



Contact Information

Newsroom Banner


Thanks To You We're Growing Faster Than Ever Before

Chances are you've noticed that Newsroom Magazine is a very different publication.

We care about journalism -- and we're well aware many other organizations do it far better than we.

Our editorial standards, rules of custody, and skeptical editing for everything we produce, disseminate or expose to public viewing reflects a seriousness of purpose.

Six years after our founding, Newsroom Magazine continues to evolve the online publishing and preservation model we pioneered.

There is good news to share: Newsroom Magazine is is thriving.

And some less good news: Our limited resources, both journalistically and financially, are limiting our expansion of content.

Online News Preservation

In the six years since its founding, Newsroom Magazine has extended the field of news publishing into previously uncharted areas.

We take a long range view of news -- one that considers both timeliness and historical merit.

What we do, and how we do it, was not possible in the print media era -- for our content is both timely and timeless in the sense that we share the power of immediacy with all online media plus the perseverance of an encyclopedia.

Newsroom Magazine's publishing model goes beyond immediacy -- for unlike the newspaper era -- what we publish is permanently preserved. And tagged, indexed, and constantly updated by automated sitemap sharing with Google, Yahoo, Bing, Yandex, Baidu, Sogou, Ewatch, Alexa, Facebook, and others at home and far away.

All of our content, is meant to be preserved. Thanks to the capture and storage of our content at Google, including all updates and changes, and full collection archiving by the U.S. Internet Archives, everything we say, write, opine -- whether wise, foolish, or inconsequential-- is preserved.

Newsroom Magazine content remains forever online, searchable and accessible 24 hours a day worldwide.

What's Hot Is Rarely What Matters

What we publish today is rarely as timely as the more traditional publications and online newspapers. What we choose to publish, sometimes days or months after a story first breaks, or on a subject neglected by most commercial media, is chosen to reflect one aspect of an ongoing reality for long term preservation.

From a handful of English-only readers when we published our first article -- the 1958 Edward R. Murrow speech before the Radio Television Directors Association in Chicago -- we have grown and wizened about our responsibilities to our readers and our own limitations and shortfalls.

Our most read article so far this year, The Adventures Of Bernie In Wonderland, was published November 23rd, 2009. The article consists of the unexpurgated SEC interview of Harry Markopolos in the Bernie Madoff Ponzi swindle case. It is not very interesting reading and it is very long -- but we published it in the belief that what it revealed was important and unlikely to remain online in its original format.

Newsroom Magazine's Storehouse Grows Every Day

The number of publications who devote themselves to publishing credible, responsible and probative content for posterity has dwindled.

Today Newsroom Magazine publishes a storehouse of credible, probative and relevant content -- well over 5000 articles including commentaries, essays, definitions, photographs, stories, reviews, discussions, tutorials, and logical explanations.

Our readership is nearly three times was it was only last year. Few might come to our content for entertainment -- for our purpose is otherwise.

If You Publish, They Will Come

We are read on Capitol Hill, along K Street, and in the halls of government inside the beltway and around the world.

We are read daily on college campuses at home and abroad. We're visited from military ships at sea. We serve law-firms, major corporations, Wall Street the UK Parliament, state governments and cities with credible useful information.

Some of the world's most prestigious news organizations use Newsroom Magazine for fact-checking.

Government Information Unfiltered, Sometimes Imperfect

The amount of official news proffered each day by government, whether at home or abroad, is accelerating. Some of it newsworthy, most of it not.

Our job is to thoughtfully choose what's worthy of the attention of our readers.

About 1% of government issued news we receive each day qualifies as newsworthy. Only the most relevant, or reflective of government at its best, or at its worst, or evidence of overreach, or ineptitude makes it newsworthy.

We leave the issue of deciding which if any of these qualifications applies to what we publish up to the reader.

Formatted For People On The Go, Or On The Hunt

All of our government news content includes above the headline call out meant to convey the principal facts, action or information for those with little time to read a long document.

Our job is to carefully and skeptically choose relevant governmental content for our readers -- and to include the unexpurgated original source material, whose chain of custody we control.

Online Editorial Standards, Ethics And Purpose

Our commitment to time-honored journalistic standards and a clear statement about the ethics to which we agree to be held today and tomorrow, Newsroom Magazine began publication when the Internet was young -- 2006.

Our prime mission then, as now, is to publish non political ideas, definitions, essays and editorials.

To speak to the state of this honorable calling.

And to inform the public about those things, events and ideas that matter most to us all.

Today, tomorrow, forever.


Editorial Standards & Policies
Browse All Content
Browse
CFTC Section
Goldman Sachs Settles $8.3 Billion CFTC Internal Control Failue For $1.5 Million

Published: Monday December 10, 2012 9:00 am EDT
Article Length: 821 Words
Reading Time: 4 Minutes

… for several months, Goldman failed to ensure that certain aspects of its risk management, compliance, and supervision programs comported with its obligations to supervise diligently its business as a Commission registrant. During November and December 2007, Goldman further failed to supervise diligently the trading activities of an associated person and former Goldman trader, Matthew Marshall Taylor, whose trading activities on seven days in mid-November and mid-December 2007 in the e-mini S&P 500 futures contract traded on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange’s (CME) Globex platform resulted in a substantial loss to Goldman.

Washington

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

CFTC Orders Goldman, Sachs & Co., A Commission Registrant, To Pay $1.5 Million For Supervision Failures

By exploiting Goldman’s internal control failures, a former Goldman employee hid an $8.3 billion trading position; Goldman lost in excess of $100 million unwinding the position

December 7, 2012

Washington, DC – The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) today announced that Goldman, Sachs & Co. (Goldman), a registered futures commission merchant (FCM) based in New York, N.Y., has been ordered to pay a $1.5 million civil monetary penalty to settle CFTC charges that it failed to diligently supervise its employees for several months in late 2007. The CFTC Order also requires Goldman to cease and desist from violating a CFTC regulation requiring diligent supervision.

According to the CFTC’s Order, for several months, Goldman failed to ensure that certain aspects of its risk management, compliance, and supervision programs comported with its obligations to supervise diligently its business as a Commission registrant. During November and December 2007, Goldman further failed to supervise diligently the trading activities of an associated person and former Goldman trader, Matthew Marshall Taylor, whose trading activities on seven days in mid-November and mid-December 2007 in the e-mini S&P 500 futures contract traded on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange’s (CME) Globex platform resulted in a substantial loss to Goldman.

Specifically, in violation of Commission Regulation 166.3, Goldman failed to have policies or procedures reasonably designed to detect and prevent the manual entry of fabricated futures trades into its front office systems, which aggregated manually entered and electronically executed trades in the same product. As a result, on seven trading days in November and December 2007, Taylor circumvented Goldman’s risk management, compliance, and supervision systems, by entering fabricated e-mini S&P 500 sell trades into its manual trading system, which artificially offset and thereby camouflaged e-mini S&P 500 buy trades Taylor had executed in the market. In particular, Taylor established an $8.3 billion e-mini S&P 500 position in a Goldman trading account on December 13, 2007. Goldman suffered a loss of over $118 million in unwinding Taylor’s position.

Separately, the Order states that after Taylor was discharged, Goldman orally notified the CME and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). Goldman’s ensuing regulatory filings with the National Futures Association (NFA) and FINRA stated that Taylor had been accused of “violating investment-related statutes, regulations, rules, or industry standards of conduct” for “conduct related to inappropriately large proprietary futures positions in a firm trading account.” Thereafter, in response to FINRA’s follow-up inquiries, Goldman provided additional important information only to FINRA, i.e., that Taylor attempted to conceal his trading via fabricated trades. Goldman never provided that additional important information to the NFA or the Commission until after the CFTC’s Division of Enforcement commenced the investigation leading to today’s settlement.

The Order states that Goldman has represented in its settlement offer that it has made changes in light of the events discussed in the Order, including implementing written enhancements to its U.S. futures-related trading and risk management controls and supervision policies and procedures. Goldman has also undertaken to implement a written procedure to enhance its provision of information to the NFA and the Commission about misconduct or alleged misconduct of terminated Goldman employees that relates to trading on a Commission-regulated market to ensure that termination notifications of associated persons, including follow-up disclosures, are provided to the NFA and the Commission.

On November 8, 2012, in a related action, the CFTC filed an enforcement action in the Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York, charging Taylor with defrauding Goldman by intentionally concealing from Goldman the true size, as well as the risk and potential profits or losses associated with the S&P e-mini futures contracts positions traded by Taylor in the Goldman account (see CFTC Press Release 6409-12, November 8, 2012 under Related Links).

CFTC staff members responsible for this case are Janine Gargiulo, Trevor Kokal, Judith Slowly, David Acevedo, Lenel Hickson, Stephen Obie, and Vincent McGonagle.

Source: Commodity Futures Trading Commission