Serving The Public Interest Without Fear Or Prejudice
Newsroom Magazine's principal mission is to credibly and responsibly inform readers about the world in which we live.
What we present as fact is to the best of our knowledge true and sufficiently revealed to be relied upon.
What we publish is selected based on its news value and/or its national or global relevance to responsible citizens and those who seek to govern them.
What we publish is chosen to provide meaningful insight into, or clearer perspective about the world in which we live.
Fidelity To Fact
The foundations upon which our mission rest are fairness, accountability, responsibility and fidelity-to-fact.
Serving the public interest without fear or prejudice rests upon our collective commitment to a clearly defined code of ethics, and consistently applied journalistic standards and editorial practices.
The journalistic mechanisms by which we stand and to which we commit our reputation are credibility, relevancy and probity.
Fulfillment of our mission rests, in part, on Newsroom Magazine's searchable and globally visible repository of everything we publish.
Our mission requires that we record and index reports, findings and official statements about the role of government(s) in the world in which we live that are based upon editorial selection predicated upon credibility, relevancy and probity.
To fully understand what government is doing, or failing to do, depends on a broad range of information about world and national issues and events. We focus on national and international stories -- most of which are related to U.S. government actions, decisions, legislation, regulation and military matters.
Spin And Propaganda
Government generated news and information is no more forthright, or accurate, or fair, or complete than any other source of information whose content is intended to support, explain or spin a single viewpoint. Governmental news releases, statements or testimony is by definition propaganda -- no matter how much substantive information surrounds it.
Information That Matters
Newsroom Magazine does not edit or modify government provided information, but we do consciously select and publish content that contains explicit information worthy of being permanently visible online.
What Government Says Matters
While our editors seek to publish government-sourced information for its factual foundations we knowingly publish, from time to time, governmental materials that are egregiously overstated, highly politicized, slanted to administration policy, or simply foolish or misguided.
What we publish is intended to provide the reader an unfiltered glimpse of government. We offer neither support for that which is best, nor criticism of that which is not. Our job is to validate that the source materials published by Newsroom Magazine are legitimate government delivered information.
The government, department, agency, or authority to which the content is attributed is solely responsible for the credibility, accuracy and fairness of what they said and how they said it.
World Wide Reference
Being an on-line publication means that the immense indexing capabilities inherent in our database(s) makes our content a repository of news and information that is easily accessible by anyone, anywhere and any time.
Responsible Adults, Skeptical Editing, Thoughtful Commentary
Those who form, select, edit, oversee, manage and/or author Newsroom Magazine content are charged with fulfilling our mission by way of a narrative, opinion, commentaries, essays, editorials, news analysis, and stories about the human condition and/or the American Experience.
Narrative content published by Newsroom Magazine is supported, when and where appropriate, by utility resources including definitions of terms or words that appear in both narrative and news content and/or logical definitions and constructs.
In fulfillment of our mission we pledge to be responsible, credible and journalistically sound so that we might deliver newsworthy information and materials including that which reveals government in its own words absent fear or prejudice.
Editorial Standards & Policies
SEC Releases 2nd Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization Report
Published: Friday November 16, 2012 11:00 am EDT
Article Length: 664 Words
Reading Time: 3 Minutes
The SEC’s enhanced oversight of NRSROs is having a positive effect. The firms have been generally responsive to the staff’s recommendations, which are intended to strengthen NRSROs’ policies, procedures, and operations and to make their internal governance and controls more robust. We will continue to review their responses to our recommendations and use our examinations to promote compliance with statutory and Commission requirements.
Thomas J. Butler, Director of the SEC’s Office of Credit Ratings
SEC Issues Staff Summary Report Of Examinations Of Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations
November 15, 2012
Washington, D.C., Nov. 15, 2012 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today issued its second annual staff report on the findings of examinations of credit rating agencies registered with the SEC as Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations (NRSROs). The staff determined that with one exception, all NRSROs appropriately addressed the staff’s recommendations in the first annual report in 2011. In addition, the staff announced a new initiative to highlight compliance issues at credit rating agencies between examinations.
“The SEC’s enhanced oversight of NRSROs is having a positive effect,” said Thomas J. Butler, Director of the SEC’s Office of Credit Ratings. “The firms have been generally responsive to the staff’s recommendations, which are intended to strengthen NRSROs’ policies, procedures, and operations and to make their internal governance and controls more robust. We will continue to review their responses to our recommendations and use our examinations to promote compliance with statutory and Commission requirements.”
Congress mandated the creation of the Office of Credit Ratings as part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which imposed new reporting, disclosure, and examination requirements to enhance the regulation of NRSROs. The Dodd-Frank Act requires the Commission staff to examine each NRSRO at least annually and issue a report summarizing the essential findings of the examinations. In the reports, firms are referred to as “large NRSROs” or “small NRSROs” to promote the public’s understanding without compromising due process requirements.
The 2012 report discusses the staff’s findings and recommendations in eight areas, including whether the NRSRO conducts business in accordance with its policies, procedures, and methodologies, how it manages conflicts of interest, and whether it maintains effective internal controls. The staff identified findings and made recommendations to all NRSROs. Findings identified at one or more NRSROs include the following:
- The methodology applied to rating certain securities appears to have been changed, but the change was not publicly disclosed for several months
- Certain securities were not timely downgraded in accordance with policies and procedures related to rating watch status
- Methodologies were published and disclosed inconsistently and in a less-than-transparent manner
- Directors were not actively exercising their required oversight duties
In addition to the recommendations to NRSROs based on the 2012 exams, the SEC’s Office of Credit Ratings will promote compliance between exams by sending letters to the Designated Compliance Officers at all of the firms as issues arise. The first industry-wide “Dear DCO” letter, sent today, urges NRSROs to review SEC rules on preventing the misuse of material nonpublic information and avoiding unfair, coercive, or abusive practices with respect to credit ratings. The letter is available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov/about/offices/ocr.shtml.
Source: Securities & Exchange Commission