Newsroom Magazine USA Edition USA Edition Today Is Thursday, May 23, 2013

Contact Information

Newsroom Banner




There is a higher calling — one that rests in an honored realm beyond the ordinary affairs of men.

It is a sacred place — having been erected in the traditions of freedom, and consecrated in the blood of those who have paid the ultimate price in pursuing journalism’s enduring quest for truth.

The Honorable House Of The Fourth Estate being that place in the American experience where the bells of freedom ring loud and clear so that all free men and women shall forever know what matters most to their livelihoods, families, communities and nation.

Credible - Responsible - Probative

Credibility is the foundation for all journalism no matter medium or method of transmission.

Relevancy to our livelihoods, families, communities and nation are central to how we define news.

New media journalism is a servant of the people.

Being relevant demands that new media journalism stand-in for our viewers, readers, listeners or visitors and defend the public’s right to know what persons, institutions and governments are doing in the name of free and sovereign citizens.

Experienced and credible new media news services are tenured, qualified and full fledged members of the free press, second to none and equal to all.

Probity, accuracy, balance, provenance, and credibility in journalism are the currency of the realm in earning and maintaining public trust and confidence.

Robert Butche Publisher



Editorial Standards & Policies
Browse All Content
Browse
Food For Thought Section
‘Big Brother’ Emerges In The Aftermath Of Citizens-United

Published: Wednesday February 1, 2012 1:00 pm EDT
Updated: Thursday February 2, 2012 6:33 am EDT
Article Length: 740 Words
Reading Time: 3 Minutes

With big media so engrossed in horse race politics and process, the issues — those things that matter most to preserve our livelihoods, if not our nation, remain all but absent from political debate. In their stead rich contributors fuel opposition research armies that flood television with untruths, half-truths and take-no-prisoners character assassination.

Washington

Food For Thought

The New Voice In American Politics

Readers are invited to add their voice to this and other commentaries. Submissions that meet our published standards for probity and language will be considered for publication under the writer’s name.

Click Here To Send Us Your Comments

Those who have watched any of the Republican Presidential Debates know that America is in trouble. Not from the ideas or political inclinations proffered by the candidates, but from the incursion of money, opposition research — and duplicity on the part of some segments of the journalistic establishment.

There’s a new voice in American political debate. One whose sole purpose is to manipulate, misdirect, and rally a largely ignorant electorate. Their tools are commercialized political speech that conceals reality and avoids constructive debate while perpetuating ignorance among their fellow citizens.

Big Brother Wins Florida

Big Brother, we have now come to know, is not the government, but the rich and powerful families, corporations and labor unions empowered by Citizens-United to monopolize the political conversation.

What we’ve seen in Florida in the last two weeks is the commercialization of American political thought by unidentified persons, corporations and labor unions.

It’s unclear, in the first presidential election since the Citizen’s United decision, whether a free people can reasonably be expected to govern themselves when only those with the most money are allowed to speak.

The winner in Florida was neither one of the candidates nor their political party. The winner, and presumed winner in all contests to come, is Big Brother.

Big Brother, we have now come to know, is not George Orwell’s malevolent vision of government, but rich and powerful families, corporations and labor unions empowered by the Citizens-United decision to monopolize, dominate and define political conversation.

No matter the party, or office, from now on Big Brother sets the agenda and defines the vehicle — the video commercial. Not just this year, but for as long as we proffer the right to spend as the equivalent to the right to free and uncensored political discourse.

Free Spending As If The Equivalent Of Political Discourse

Ours is an ignorant nation — made that way by polarizing cable news program content, news decisions based on entertainment values, and happy-talk network news operations that project the illusion of normalcy in Washington when little inside the beltway might pass as such in Main Street America.

Political campaigns awash in special interest money, and openly supported by unlimited PAC spending, attack the opposition — thereby avoiding discussion of issues or agendas in favor of mud-slinging supported by hired-guns and endless opposition research.

The results of negative campaigning are contraindicated in a nation of free citizen electors for negative advertising and mindless rhetoric provide American voters little or no substantive understanding to guide them on issues of immense importance.

What underlies the commercialization of political speech is not freedom of expression but something far more sinister: the oppression of the ignorant. What the political strategists, funding organizations, opposition research specialists and advertising producers know is that ideas, ethics, principles and even political inclinations matter little when the American electorate is bombarded by constant and repetitious lies, distortions, and accusations.

With big media so engrossed in horse race politics and process, the issues — those things that matter most to preserve our livelihoods, if not our nation, remain all but absent from political debate. In their stead rich contributors now have the right to monopolize political free speech — and flood electronic media with untruths, half-truths and take-no-prisoners character assassination.

An ignorant America in which only Big Brother‘s voice is heard seems unlikely to long remain either the land of the free, or the home of the brave.

Jeffrey Slee And Gordon Shaffer Contributed Ideas To This Essay